Thursday, October 21, 2010

Funeral Guest Book Sayings

BAföG + car: cars are not household items

accounting of motor vehicles for assets of a student (Federal Administrative Court, 5 C 3 / 09, decision of 30.06.2010)

Last year the Federal Administrative Court ruled that motor vehicles regardless of size or other characteristics as an asset within the meaning of § to consider 27 BAföG with the actual value.

context of decision:
Earlier, the BAföG offices all vehicles considered regardless of their size and other characteristics as household items, which according to § 27 paragraph 2 No. 4 BAföG not contribute to the ability of the trainees be. This approach is even an appropriately worded administrative regulation 27.2.5 VwV provide.
The administrative courts are not bound to adopt the regulations, because they have no legal standing.
are BAföG offices since 2007, mostly gone to the principles of social courts for asset accounting of motor vehicles in the social assistance law by analogy. This resulted in the present practice means that vehicles will remain free to qualifying to a value of 7,500 € (Federal Social Court of 6.9.2007, B 14/7b AS 66/06).

The current decision of the Federal Administrative Court:
In his recent ruling the Federal Administrative Court now expressly denies the freedom of the recognition of motor vehicles for wealth, while the administrative regulation 27.2.5 expressly left out of consideration. A vehicle is classified as goods in the amount of action using its recovery proceeds recoverable assets.
The Federal Administrative Court has also made reference to a provision in the Social Welfare Law, § 12 para 3 No 2 SGB II, after which an appropriate motor vehicle is excluded separately and specifically refers to an asset recovery. That fact, however, according to the Federal Administrative Court against a straight right cross-recovery principle of freedom of motor vehicles.
is thus rejected the same time the existing administrative-law case, in the interest of a simple discretionary move, a recovery only requires such motor vehicles as a luxury or value of capital assets (vintage) are classified, the normal value exceeds significantly, have a significant value or which is to reasonable life of a student is not required.

Conclusion:
likely of the above, also so far received from the offices BAföG appropriate application of the Federal Social Court adopted qualifying free limit amount of 7,500 € for motor vehicles of recipients of ALG 2 (or Hartz IV) does have (SPA v. 6.9.2007, above). For apprentices is in contrast to job-seeking recipients of basic security services do not require integration into working life at the center. As the BAföG offices in old cases will deal with that case remains to be seen. For new applications it will probably require an explicit reference to indicate the future of motor vehicles upon the declaration of the assets in Form 1.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Lug Nut For 2004impala

initial and further second training

In principle, only the first job-skills training should be encouraged. The right to promote the capabilities of a single and inclinations of the students training to follows directly from § § 1, 7 BAföG. The promotion claim is limited to a single after training, regardless of whether it has been successfully completed or aborted.

The grant claim is thus consumed as soon as a the reason it was discontinued after the BAföG eligible training.
This applies even if the training has been completed abroad, and then able to practice, but not in Germany.
The lack of recognition of foreign education in the country and therefore the unexploitability of study completed abroad Training in the German labor market will in principle, to any claim to promote the further training in Germany. Different if the student was unable to decide between an education in the country or abroad, which is regularly apply to refugees, displaced persons or asylum seekers.

for foreign spouses of Germans, who have before the marriage has ended one of the merits of eligible training
comes allens if further support to the hardness requirement of § 7 para 2 sentence 2 BAföG considered , that special circumstances must be present.

Monday, October 4, 2010

Missouri Teaching Non-certificate

He's back - the Garze Castle Wall!

Only a few months ago you had to ask if he was away for work and answer the question in the affirmative. Overgrown and no structures were overgrown the castle walls more visible. This has been thanks to the program "more local", but changed.

In three work assignments more than 220 (!) Garz and Garzerinner, Tourists, Guest and surrounding residents actively involved. They put the heat at maximum about 1.5 ha released large plateau, the sports complex brought back to light, which is located directly next to the castle wall and were now fighting in the third labor input on 2 October with the slopes of the embankment. They were overgrown over the years as well.

50 volunteers aged from 3 to 73 years, first cleaned in preparation for Memorial Day, the area around the memorial. In several groups, including shrubs and bushes that had grown over the years around the castle wall were removed.
Both enjoy their work and the food - grilled firefighters - agreed, so that a lot could be done.

Another site at the third labor input was again the sports complex, where the top layer could be applied to the tracks, so that after the completion of remaining work to physical education at the castle wall in the way of anything.

Mayor Gitta Gohla is pleased and happy about the great commitment, points out that some supporters were with all three working operating times and hopes for the next year, this "strength (s) on site, order something together for the do smallest and oldest city in Rügen.